Randomised trial finds AI echocardiogram reports as accurate as human drafts and nearly halves reading time

Presented at AHA Scientific Sessions 2026, the study compared AI, sonographer and cardiologist preliminary reports on the same 1,200 echocardiograms; the results are preliminary and not peer-reviewed.
Why it matters
The researchers say it is the first randomised trial of an AI tool drafting a full echocardiogram report, including interpretations and measurements. Cardiologists reviewed drafts blind to whether AI, a sonographer or a cardiologist wrote them, and accuracy was judged by how often they made substantial changes. Echocardiography is the most widely used heart imaging, so time saved per scan adds up across a day, co-senior author Keane K. Lee of Kaiser Permanente said. AHA abstracts are not peer-reviewed; watch for the full publication.
Key facts
- 1,200 echocardiograms from routine care
- AI vs sonographer vs cardiologist preliminary reports
- Cardiologist interpretation time cut by about 50%
- Late-Breaking Science Abstract 28202, AHA Scientific Sessions 2026