EN ▾
SNAPE REP RT Front page →
ConfirmedMedicine09 Nov, 16:22 UTC

Randomised trial finds AI echocardiogram reports as accurate as human drafts and nearly halves reading time

American Heart Association illustration of a heart with its arteries
American Heart Association

Presented at AHA Scientific Sessions 2026, the study compared AI, sonographer and cardiologist preliminary reports on the same 1,200 echocardiograms; the results are preliminary and not peer-reviewed.

Read at American Heart Association Share

Why it matters

The researchers say it is the first randomised trial of an AI tool drafting a full echocardiogram report, including interpretations and measurements. Cardiologists reviewed drafts blind to whether AI, a sonographer or a cardiologist wrote them, and accuracy was judged by how often they made substantial changes. Echocardiography is the most widely used heart imaging, so time saved per scan adds up across a day, co-senior author Keane K. Lee of Kaiser Permanente said. AHA abstracts are not peer-reviewed; watch for the full publication.

Key facts

  • 1,200 echocardiograms from routine care
  • AI vs sonographer vs cardiologist preliminary reports
  • Cardiologist interpretation time cut by about 50%
  • Late-Breaking Science Abstract 28202, AHA Scientific Sessions 2026

Sources

More on Medicine
More from Snape ReportFront page →