EN ▾
SNAPE REP RT Front page →
ConfirmedPolicy04 Nov, 16:49 UTC

AI super PACs spent $79m across 68 races, but their candidates mostly lost to the Democratic wave

Photo accompanying Fortune's report on how AI super PAC-backed candidates fared in the 2026 midterms
Getty Images via Fortune

A pro-data-centre PAC's $4.8m for Darline Graham was the industry's biggest general-election bet; she lost South Carolina's Senate race to Annie Andrews.

Read at Fortune Share

Why it matters

The AI industry split its money between two networks: Leading the Future, funded by Andreessen Horowitz founders and Greg Brockman and favouring light, national rules, and Public First, which backs stronger safeguards. Each runs one PAC per party. Fortune's tally finds the winners they backed were mostly Democrats in races the party carried anyway. The result adds to exit-poll and ballot evidence that data centres hurt candidates, and weakens the case that industry money can buy a lenient Congress before federal AI legislation is written.

Key facts

  • $79 million across 68 House and Senate seats (Tech Influence Watch)
  • $4,801,981 backed Darline Graham, who lost
  • Andrews won 51.1% to 46.7%
  • Leading the Future spent $8.1m against Alex Bores in June
  • Leading the Future had $34m cash on hand

Sources

More on Policy
More from Snape ReportFront page →